What If All A Person Had Was A Corrupt Bible or Nothing?

2nd Corinthians 2:14-17, “Now thanks be unto God, which always causeth us to triumph in Christ, and maketh manifest the savour of his knowledge by us in every place. For we are unto God a sweet savour of Christ, in them that are saved, and in them that perish: To the one we are the savour of death unto death; and to the other the savour of life unto life. And who is sufficient for these things? For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.”

Someone recently attempted to defend the Devil's modern Bible revisions, by asking me a hypothetical question. They asked me if it would be better to give a New International Version (NIV) to someone who is serving life in prison, than to give them nothing?

Thankfully I am not aware of any such occurrences. Kindly, the preceding illustration is like asking if it would be better to eat food laced with rat poison than to have no food at all. Depending on how much rat poison is contained in the food, a person might be able to survive but be sickly. Some of the modern Bible versions are more corrupt than others. In 1881 when Brooke Westcott and Fenton Hort introduced their A New Translation In The Original Greek to the world, it set a wicked precedent for scholars to constantly change the inspired Word of God (Romans 1:25). The newer versions keep getting worse and worse, drifting farther and farther from the truth.

There can be no justification for tampering with the Holy Bible.

“There is a spirit of discouragement on churches like I've never seen before!” —Pastor Danny Castle, a quote from the sermon titled: “The Lost Generation”